> I get really > worried about text -- especially new text-- in these procedural > documents that enables or encourages potential protocol > lawyers... whether they are inside the IESG or outside the core > IETF community.
a reasonable worry (sorry to say) - note though that the text I'm suggesting is already in RFC 2026 so unless this new ID specifically obsoletes the section of RFC 2026 (right now the ID says its compatable with that section) - the old text still could be used by those protocol lawyers Scott _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
