Hi - > From: "Fred Templin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Pekka Savola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 5:35 PM > Subject: Re: Last Call: 'The IESG and RFC Editor documents: Procedures' to BCP ... > I have never seen such a statement appearing in an I-D before. > Is this a standard statement for such procedural documents? > And, is the intention that it be removed (by the RFC editor, > I guess) before publishing as BCP? ...
RFC 3667 clause 5.5 says it's required in all IETF documents. None of the exceptions listed in clause 5.6 would appear to apply. Randy _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
