On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Brian Rosen wrote:

You guys don't have a problem with the "defensive suspension"/"no first use"
clauses, do you?

Is there a "preferred" wording for it?

I think you'll find virtually identical wording on this topic in several well-known licenses:


  http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

  http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/MPL-1.1.html

  http://www.eclipse.org/legal/cpl-v10.html

  http://www.opensource.org/licenses/afl-2.1.php

 - RL "Bob"


_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to