There is one paragraph that does talk about licensing, in paragraph 7 of section 3.1, and we can add it there:
It is preferred that Developed Software be
provided and licensed for IASA and IETF use in source
code form, with no ongoing payments.No binding promises, but our preference is clear. Makes sense?
--On 11. februar 2005 07:10 -0800 Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote:
In reviewing the IASA BCP I noticed a minor issue:
S 2.2 and 3.1 refer to "perpetual right to use, display, etc." The standard language here typically includes both "royalty-free" (or "fully-paid up") and "irrevocable". I would particularly think we want to specify that no future royalties are due.
-Ekr
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
