Re: IPR language in IASA BCP

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:39:53 -0800

On re-reading this, I can't figure out how to make it scan properly - the reason being that both paragraphs you point at talk about "right" to use, while "fully-paid-up", "royalty-free" and "irrevocable" typically applies to one particular type of rights assignment - licensing.

Leslie has already pointed out the need to start in on an IPR management guidebook for the IASA, and the transition team has started that work - so I think we should move that issue there.

Makes sense?

                    Harald

--On 11. februar 2005 07:10 -0800 Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote:

In reviewing the IASA BCP I noticed a minor issue:

S 2.2 and 3.1 refer to "perpetual right to use, display, etc."
The standard language here typically includes both "royalty-free"
(or "fully-paid up") and "irrevocable". I would particularly think
we want to specify that no future royalties are due.

-Ekr



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf







_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to