Henrik Levkowetz wrote:

Sounds like a good idea.  However it requires direct integration with the
tracker, which means that the tools team can't just put up a prototype,

Not really - one could associate the WGLC with just the draft name, and use that name as the key into the tracker. A similar approach could be used to track charter deadlines.

the way we've put up the tools.ietf.org/wg/<wg> pages.
I've added this to the tool suggestions page,
http://tools.ietf.org/wiki/ToolSuggestions


        Henrik

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to