on 2005-06-16 01:53 Henning Schulzrinne said the following:
> Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
>
>> Sounds like a good idea. However it requires direct integration with the
>> tracker, which means that the tools team can't just put up a prototype,
>
> Not really - one could associate the WGLC with just the draft name, and
> use that name as the key into the tracker. A similar approach could be
> used to track charter deadlines.
That won't feed the WGLC information into the tracker, which was the
most salient point of Jeffrey's idea, I thought. Without that, you're
left with something close to what I first described.
Henrik
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
