> On 01/22/2006 22:27 PM, John Loughney allegedly wrote: > > Look at various peer-to-peer protocols as a good > > examples of things that people use everyday, but wouldn't stand a > > chance of getting an RFC. > > Why not?
Now we're close to side veering off into process issues, but rather than going into that rat-hole, I'll just pose a question: do you think p2p protocol authors would have any motiviation to create a Security Considerations section that would pass IESG review? John _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
