> I can understand that you may be reluctant to dive back in having > seen the WG formed but I think "not listening" isn't really correct. > Maybe you meant "didn't listen"? Even if that's what he really meant, it is not correct. My recollection is that every issue raised, by anyone, got considered. There's quite a difference between "not listening" vs. "not agreeing". d/ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussion... Dave Crocker
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discu... Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do d... Dave Crocker
- Re: are we willing to do change how we ... Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how... Michael Thomas
- Re: are we willing to do chang... Keith Moore
- RE: are we willing to do change how we do discu... Gray, Eric
- RE: are we willing to do change how we do discu... Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do d... Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we ... Michael Thomas
- Re: are we willing to do change how... Keith Moore
