>>>>> "Bill" == Bill Fenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bill> On 2/24/07, Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think there's a good split between RFC 3967 and this
>> document. RFC 3967 will cover informational documents; this
>> document will cover standards track.
Bill> I have to admit that when I was reading this document I was
Bill> confused by section 4; I thought for a while that the
Bill> draft-klensin-norm-ref rules could be applied to
Bill> informational references, but then the first paragraph of
Bill> section 5 says it can't. It took me a while to understand
Bill> that section 4 actually refers to annotating downrefs
Bill> approved under the existing rules.
Clarifications small enough that they do not require a new last call
are very welcome.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
