> > Maybe we are getting to the point in time where we should only have IPv6
> > at IETF meetings or it that's premature run IPv4 behind a couple of
> > layers of NAT.
>
> On the theory that the ietf meeting net is for production services, wouldn't
> it make sense to have the time to cut over to pure ipv6 be when production use
> of ipv4 becomes minimal?
maybe we can have the default "IETF61" SSID be pro-IPv6, and SSID
"legacy" be IPv4-only :-P
itojun
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf