> > Maybe we are getting to the point in time where we should only have IPv6 
> > at IETF meetings or it that's premature run IPv4 behind a couple of 
> > layers of NAT.
> 
> On the theory that the ietf meeting net is for production services, wouldn't 
> it make sense to have the time to cut over to pure ipv6 be when production use
> of ipv4 becomes minimal?

        maybe we can have the default "IETF61" SSID be pro-IPv6, and SSID
        "legacy" be IPv4-only :-P

itojun

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to