> >> maybe we can have the default "IETF61" SSID be pro-IPv6, and SSID
> >> "legacy" be IPv4-only :-P
> >
> >
> > Ahh, well. That moves the change from being coercive to being cool.
>
> No, that moves it to being pejorative.
>
> In any case, what is the need for separate SSID's? Do you truly
> intend to clutter the airspace further with another set of AP's?
> There are effectively only three channels and you really want to use
> all three already to provide overlapping non-interfering coverage...
you right. we have been running dual stack network since 1998 or
something (Marc Blanchet should have the real answer), and we even
supplied IPv6-to-IPv4 translators, so there should be no problem at
all.
I can bring in IPv6-to-IPv4 translator if necessary. it would be an
OpenBSD Soekris box.
itojun
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
