If you think that way, then why don't you say so on the ARIN Public Policy 
Mailing List where such a comment needs to be heard. Discussion about ARIN 
policy on this list will not influence the policy process.

Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 12:58 PM
> To: Bob Braden
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce
> after all]
>
> Bob Braden wrote:
> > In this whole discussion, I find it hard to keep separate the
> > technical issues, about which the IETF should care a lot, from
> > the business model and issues, about which the IETF should be
> > agnostic.  We may personally care a great deal about the business
> > issues, but we cannot speak as an organization about them.
> >
> well, mumble.  we shouldn't be biased toward any particular business
> model.  but there's nothing wrong with being biased towards
> flexibility,
> or being biased against the RIRs changing IETF decisions to favor a
> particular business model.
>
> again, the fundamental problem here is that the RIRs are trying to
> second-guess IETF design decisions.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to