References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: IETF-Discussion discussion list <[email protected]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ralph Droms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Lightening talks at the plenary
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:58:49 -0400
To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Oct 2007 15:58:10.0251 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[826861B0:01C8158D]

Taking that idea a little further, we could emulate SIGCOMM and have  
a couple of Outrageous Opinions talks.

Or, perhaps we get enough of those on the IETF mailing lists already...

- Ralph

On Oct 23, 2007, at Oct 23, 2007,10:58 AM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:

> At the last plenary there was some talk about there no longer being  
> the technical presentations we used to have. Suggestions were made  
> that this return.
>
> An alternative that might be more interesting would be to adopt the  
> W3C practice of lightning talks which are 3 minute presentations on  
> a very specific topic. These are actually quite fun.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to