-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Michael Thomas wrote: | Noel Chiappa wrote: |> > From: Peter Constable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |> |> > Frankly, it strikes me as somewhat odd that a body acting as a |> > standards-setting organization with public impact might allow any |> > technical decision on its specifications to be driven by people |> > operating under a cloak of anonymity. Expressing an anonymous |> > [criticism]? No problem. Influencing determination of a consensus with |> > public impact? That should not be allowed, IMO. |> |> Excellent point. |> |> | So I've never met you, Noel. And I certainly don't have any reason to | believe that this email I'm responding to wasn't forged. How do I know | that you're not a dog?
You find a third party known to you can vouch for the existence of Noel, and then you get noel to admit that he sent the message. | Mike | _______________________________________________ | IETF mailing list | IETF@ietf.org | https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH6Tpr8AA1q7Z/VrIRAvk4AJ4g0LqMWGH0YNrAV87SV101XxExWwCeKiDD rXPg8qEjVBzPtyYK5u6MWTc= =7Lu5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
