Hi, On 2009-12-15, at 17:50, JP Vasseur wrote: >> First it wasn't clear from the document if "congestion" was >> referring to the PCE itself or the corresponding LSPs. For clarity >> of discussion, I will assume LSP congestion. Even if that is not >> correct, my comments are general and there are equivalent problems >> for PCE case. >> > > This is, in fact, the wrong assumption. The congestion metric refers > to the congestion of the PCE itself. > > We will add a clarification of this point to the top of section 4.4 as > follows: > > Note that "congestion" as indicated by this object refers to the > processing state of the PCE and its ability to handle new PCEP > requests.
didn't we change the terminology form "congestion" to "overload" in earlier documents, to address this potential for confusion? Lars
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
