On 2009-12-16, at 10:55, JP Vasseur wrote: > Yes you are right, that rings a bell. That said, I think that with the > added text, this should be clear now.
So if we changed it to "overload" in the earlier documents, wouldn't it make sense to make the same change here for consistency? Lars
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
