On 26 Feb 2010, at 16:45, SM wrote:
At 20:11 25-02-10, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
>> Discussion, please.  See below for my take; the IETF is one host, MX is 
>> really meaningless, and there are benefits to avoiding a ton of spambot 
>> zombie spam.
> 
> While we are on this topic, which of the following methods would you 
> recommend for a point of contact:
> 
>  1. mailto [1] [2] [7] [8] [10] [12] [13]
> 
>  2. email address without mailto [9]
> 
>  3. AT [3]
> 
>  4. at [4] [11]
> 
>  5. & [5]
> 
>  6. email address as an image [6]

The only one I object to strongly is 6, and that's because I can't see it and 
nor can anybody using a textmode browser.  Other than that, it makes sense to 
avoid spam by not doing 1 or 2, although I would sooner not hide from spammers 
by breaking functionality, which 2-5 implies.

Cheers,
Sabahattin

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to