+1
--On Saturday, February 27, 2010 08:49 -0500 "John R. Levine" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> there is an MX. Where did you get the idea that not having >>> an MX offers protection from spambots? >> >> That's interesting, but not what I described. > > Well, OK. Let me rephrase my question: why do you believe > that removing the IETF's MX record will > > a) decrease the amount of spam it receives? > > b) not damage its legitimate mail flow? > > Based on my experience and that of other people, neither is > true. > > R's, > John > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
