On Aug 10, 2010, at 1:18 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
> in fairness, anyplace we don't yet have a contract is open to discussion.
> With care and in some cases communication with other organizations, we could
> change the announced dates. They were mostly picked out of the air ("could we
> do X? Well, nobody on the clash list has chosen it yet...") in the first
> place :-)
>
>
> On Aug 9, 2010, at 11:19 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
>
>> FWIW, I do think that choice of July as the meeting time is not the best in
>> terms of avoiding collisions with people's vacations. Say, early June or
>> September would probably have less conflicts with family vacations, daycare
>> shutdown periods, and the like. It would probably make it possible for more
>> people to join the meeting. Of course, any change in the meeting dates would
>> be slow. The current meeting calendar goes to November 2017...
We just put the 2014-2017 calendar out for comment in May.
Just as for any last call, it would be better if these issues were brought up
before it closes...
Regards
Marshall
>>
>> Jari
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
> http://www.ipinc.net/IPv4.GIF
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
