Mike, > I will note that for any given person asking if a date 4-7 years out is "bad" > is probably going to get pretty much a "huh? why are you asking me now?" and > the silence you encountered. In this case, silence isn't so much consent as > "I have no useful data to convey". > > But given the comments on the list, its unclear that we can/should separate > the discussion of dates from the discussion of locations - as painful as that > may be. I don't know that the IAOC should consider the 2014-2017 dates firm > quite yet.
While personally I agree (as in I have no idea what I will be doing in 2017), in order to schedule meetings and avoid conflicts with other organizations I don't see any alternative to set these dates into the future. Once they are published other organizations see them and make their schedules around ours. So I think they have to be firm. Bob _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
