Hi, On 2011-1-18, at 15:51, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > >Using a term other than "unassigned" might prevent some instances of the > >latter. > > I don't see how changing the name is going to affect behavior for the > positive here. If you do succeed in confusing people as to which numbers are > unassigned and which are not it is going to increase the risk of a collision.
huh? The purpose here is to make it *clearer* that assignment is needed. > If five people are experimenting with TCP options and this is not causing > collisions, what is the problem? Have you read my original email? It *is* going to cause collisions. Lars
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
