----- Original Message ----- From: "Lars Eggert" <[email protected]> To: "Spencer Dawkins" <[email protected]> Cc: "Iljitsch van Beijnum" <[email protected]>; "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 3:02 PM
On 2011-1-18, at 15:58, Spencer Dawkins wrote: > Lars can speak for himself, but what I THOUGHT he was talking was changing the phrase "unassigned" to something like "reserved for future assignment". Exactly. <tp> Which, presumably, would be in a BCP updating RFC5226 which only allows for Private Use: Experimental: Reserved: Not to be assigned. Unassigned: Unused and available for assignment via documented procedures. Tom Petch </tp> Lars _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
