On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Keith Moore <[email protected]>wrote:
> I suppose we should just tunnel the whole IPv6 network over IPv4 + HTTP > then. > > Seriously, the argument that 6to4 should be trashed because ISPs are > blocking tunnels has the flavor of "don't solve the problem, but rather, > stamp out the solution". > Actually, this mostly happens in enterprise networks and universities. I don't see why they would want to change this compared to, say, actually deploying native IPv6. In a similar way as Geoff measured 6to4 - looking at SYNs. > > > From where? Again, the tunnels aren't taking the variety of paths that > 6to4 connections are. It's that variety that makes measurements such as > Geoff's at all useful - it's what lets you at least believe that the > measurements made at a few points are representative of the whole. > >From the same place that he ran the 6to4 measurements from? > A few months ago I was trying to set one up, but I ran out of time. I'm > really busy these days, and it's nowhere nearly as easy to set up a > configured tunnel as it is to set up 6to4. > Go to http://tunnelbroker.net/ . I'm willing to bet that it will take a lot less time than you have spent writing email on this thread. :-)
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
