Hi! All! Why don't we run it the opposite way: -IPv6 by default, else: -Legacy: just run IPv4 with some kind of NAT.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:54 PM, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > >If we want IPv6 to be available to the average user, I think it's > >fair to assume that the average user won't get past the cluelessness. > > The average user is never going to call up and ask "can I get IPv6 as > part of my bundle along with the Home Shopping Network" so the first > level cluelessness doesn't matter. > > It's going to be available to the average user when the average cable > or DSL modem autoconfigures itself to offer IPv6, and SLAAC and DHCPv6 > work well enough on average consumer PCs and other wifi devices that > they set themselves up without any manual intervention. You know, > like they do with IPv4. > > I realize all these pieces work in theory, and often in practice if > you know what button to tweak. But Grandma is unlikely to tweak any > network buttons at all. > > R's, > John > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
