On Jun 12, 2011 11:26 PM, "Michel Py" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Cameron Byrne wrote: > > The faint promise of yet another transition mechanism is hardly > > a motivation to keep 6to4 around. The data (ripe ...) > > overwhelming proves default-on 6to4 clients + thinly deployed > > relays = unreliable ipv6 and ipv6 deployment obstacle. > > That's the difference between a fait promise and a proven failure. The promise of "IPv6 native IPv6 is going to be deployed next year" has failed for 10+ years in a row. Nobody believes in it anymore; your choices are to believe in yet another transition mechanism or switch to the post-mortem camp. >
I believe there is data to show this time is different (iana and apnic are exhausted, successful v6day, docsis 3.0 and LTE deployment ...) > Get a life. > Thanks Cb > Michel. >
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
