In article <[email protected]> you write: > >The IESG has received a request from the Domain Keys Identified Mail WG >(dkim) to consider the following document: >- 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' > <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> as a Draft Standard
I've reviewed this document, indeed my fingerprints are all over it. It's definitely an improvement to 4871: folds in the errata, takes out a lot of gratuitous and often wrong non-normative advice, cleans up the 2119 MUSTage, and otherwise improves the text. Except for the one obscure feature that is deprecated due to lack of use, I think that any implementation that is compliant with 4871+errata should still be compliant with this draft. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
