At 14:38 15-06-2011, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Domain Keys Identified Mail WG
(dkim) to consider the following document:
- 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures'
<draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> as a Draft Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
[email protected] mailing lists by 2011-06-29. Exceptionally, comments may be
This document obsoletes RFC 4871 for which there is an IPR disclosure
( http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1547/ ). As this is a move from
Proposed to Draft, is a new IPR disclosure required?
In Appendix B.1.4, [email protected] could be changed to
[email protected] (RFC 2606).
In Section C.1:
"This differs from the usage in the original DKIM specification,
where a null "g=" value is not valid for any address."
I suggest a minor change, "previous DKIM specification [RFC4871]", for clarity.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
