On Jun 21, 2011, at 1:31 AM, Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:

> On Jun 21, 2011, at 06:30 , Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>> It has been repeated ad-nausieum that "conference rates" subsidize the 
>> rental of the meeting room block... The fact that the conference rates are 
>> more expensive ( on a contract signed 24 months out) than a spot check of 
>> the room rate at any given time should come as no surprise to anyone. You 
>> can cruise the IETF finances if for some reason you don't believe this. If 
>> the room block doesn't get filled you can expect your fees to go up 
>> accordingly over time. I will observe that I have generally  not paid the 
>> conference rate or stayed in the meeting hotel while attending the IETF on 
>> my own dime (and have stayed in some rather nicer hotels (paris, stockholm, 
>> etc) for less money as a result. When I attend on behalf my employer I make 
>> it clear what we paying for when participating.
>> 
> 
> Just one additional data-point here. 
> 
> For some of us, getting reimbursed for a higher meeting fee is actually a lot 
> easier than getting reimbursed for a higher hotel-fee. Such would be the case 
> when, for example, traveling on a fixed per-diem intended for covering 
> accommodation/food, but reimbursed on cost for the meeting fee. 

Then again, for others of us, staying at a cheaper hotel a short distance away 
is actually a lot easier than paying out the wazoo for an overpriced meeting 
venue.

Keith

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to