On Jul 2, 2011, at 9:10 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Keith Moore <mo...@network-heretics.com> > wrote: > > Is the reasoning behind the decision explained somewhere? My reading of the > > threads on the subject in v6ops was that the opposition to 6to4-historic > > was a small but vocal minority, and I thought that qualified as rough > > consensus. > > Even if there was rough consensus within v6ops, rough consensus of v6ops does > not equate to rough consensus of the entire IETF community. > > And who says that "rough consensus of the entire IETF community" is that this > draft should not be published? Were there public discussions to that effect > that came to this conclusion?
There's clearly a lack of consensus to support it. Keith
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
