In your letter dated Sat, 2 Jul 2011 16:02:47 -0400 you wrote: > >> Is the reasoning behind the decision explained somewhere? My reading of the >threads on the subject in v6ops was that the opposition to 6to4-historic was a > small but vocal minority, and I thought that qualified as rough consensus. > >Even if there was rough consensus within v6ops, rough consensus of v6ops does >not equate to rough consensus of the entire IETF community.
Is there any summary of the IETF community consensus? I sort of can't imagine that ISPs want to continue operating 6to4 relays longer than strictly necessary. So I'm curious what the IETF community at large considers the future of 6to4 in it's default-disabled mode. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
