On Jul 2, 2011, at 10:00 PM, Erik Kline wrote: >> Since 6rd depends on 6to4, as it is a variant of it, would 6to4 being >> declared historic also mean that 6rd needs to become historic as well? > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-05 > Section 1, in which the draft clarifies that 6rd supersedes 6to4,
which is of course completely incorrect. Keith
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
