+1 On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Mohacsi Janos <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Ole Troan wrote: > > Keith, >> >> The alternative that I proposed to IESG and to the chairs (and never >>> received any feedback about) was to reclassify 6to4 as Experimental. >>> Experimental seems completely appropriate for a protocol that is useful, but >>> only in corner cases. And I think it's also appropriate and useful to try >>> to learn from the experience with 6to4, even if we realize that 6to4 will >>> never be a generally applicable IPv6 transition solution again. >>> >>> And maybe, just maybe, Experimental will be enough of a "slap" at 6to4 to >>> mollify the "kill it yesterday" crowd. For one thing, it clearly indicates >>> that 6to4 is no longer a standard. >>> >>> But in order to quieten down the discussion here, I suggest that people >>> reply to me privately if they can't live with this. If I get lots of those >>> replies, I'll know that it's not worth pursuing. >>> >> >> "Experimental" is certainly better than: >> - nothing >> - spending months on hold as appeals are processed. >> > > I proposed experimental also when discussion started about future of 6to4. > I support the idea. > Best Regards, > Janos Mohacsi > > > ______________________________**_________________ > v6ops mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/v6ops<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops> >
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
