On 2011-07-19 11:26, Erik Kline wrote: >> Given that each of us reads something different into the definition of >> HISTORIC, is there any hope that this thread will ever converge? > > I don't see any "progress". > > We may just have to blacklist any resolvers that have 6to4 clients > behind them and leave it at that.
Why? How would that help anybody? What would help is following the steps in the -advisory document. (Discussing how many angels can dance on the head of an RFC certainly won't help either. Could we all stop now please?) Brian _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
