On Jul 19, 2011, at 3:21 AM, t.petch wrote: > What is needed is some lateral thinking, such as the proposal that instead of > trying to shoehorn an RFC into an inappropriate, closed set of maturity > levels, > we use a completely different option, namely an Appplicability Statement that > spells out that this magnificent standards track, non-historic piece of > technology now has an extremely limited applicability, and unless you really > know what you are doing, forget it.
An Applicability Statement was my first suggestion for how to address the problem, and it's still acceptable to me. Keith _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
