Thomas Nadeau <tnad...@lucidvision.com> wrote: > On Jul 31, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Eric Burger wrote: >> On Jul 31, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote: >> >>> Something like this: >>> 8:30-11:00 Session I >>> 11:15-12:15 Session II >>> 12:30-13:30 Session III >> >> I really like it, as there are a bunch of post-IETF stuff, some of >> which starts in the afternoon and thus conflicts with the IETF. > > I'd actually vote for NO meetings on Fridays...
We have been trying to treat Friday as a "real" day for a year or so, and it's only partly working. For IETF81, I'd have to rate the Friday TSVWG and V6OPS an a success (though I was barely functional by then). Squeezing them into the Monday-Thursday schedule would have made for serious conflicts. We need some improved paradigms... For one, I suggest we take remote-participation _seriously_ for the Friday meetings. Many of us are waiting-for-Godot at airports on Friday, and could certainly wear a headphone/mike and watch our laptop screens. Meetecho seemed ready to manage that sort of thing. :^) -- John Leslie <j...@jlc.net> _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
