On Aug 1, 2011, at 9:39 AM, John Leslie wrote:
> Thomas Nadeau <tnad...@lucidvision.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 31, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Eric Burger wrote:
>>> On Jul 31, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
>>>
>>>> Something like this:
>>>> 8:30-11:00 Session I
>>>> 11:15-12:15 Session II
>>>> 12:30-13:30 Session III
>>>
>>> I really like it, as there are a bunch of post-IETF stuff, some of
>>> which starts in the afternoon and thus conflicts with the IETF.
>>
>> I'd actually vote for NO meetings on Fridays...
>
> We have been trying to treat Friday as a "real" day for a year or so,
> and it's only partly working.
>
> For IETF81, I'd have to rate the Friday TSVWG and V6OPS an a success
> (though I was barely functional by then). Squeezing them into the
> Monday-Thursday schedule would have made for serious conflicts.
>
> We need some improved paradigms...
>
> For one, I suggest we take remote-participation _seriously_ for the
> Friday meetings. Many of us are waiting-for-Godot at airports on Friday,
> and could certainly wear a headphone/mike and watch our laptop screens.
> Meetecho seemed ready to manage that sort of thing. :^)
That may work, but it does require that someone be at the meeting venue
while the rest sit in the airport.
--Tom
>
> --
> John Leslie <j...@jlc.net>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
