On Aug 14, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Ronald Bonica wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> >> [snip] >> >> When an AD is clearly in the rough against the consensus of the IESG >> they should not have the power to individually block the progress of >> work for which there is clear IETF consensus. >> > > +1
I don't disagree with the above. What I disagree with is the notion that the rest of the overworked IESG provides adequate review. > The current voting procedure is the only protection that the community has > against an AD who has decided that his opinion trumps the expertise of the > working group and the rest of the IESG. It's the only protection that exists now. But it's not the only way to solve the problem. Keith _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
