Hi Thomas, The paragraph below does not belong to me. In my message I was actually answering it.
Regards, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Narten [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 3:51 PM > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) > Cc: Keith Moore; Barry Leiba; [email protected]; IETF > Subject: Re: IESG voting procedures > > "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email protected]> writes: > > > The only other formal level of review we have are the Last Call > > comments which, given the volume of documents that get Last Called, > > amounts to a fairly small and random chance that somebody outside > > the WG will happen to notice the proposed document action and give > > the document a thorough review. > > ADs can and should arm twist impacted parties to review documents that > appear to be troubled and for which approval has troubling > implications. > > If an AD can't rally the community (and more specifically parties that > will be forced to implement or deploy a technology) to oppose a > problematical document, that speaks volumes to the issue. > > Thoma _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
