> On 2011-09-11 08:11, Sam Hartman wrote: > > <snip> > >> I do not think the following types of comments should be considered as >> objections when judging this sort of consensus: >> >> >> 2) This will not do any good
now lets see, this argument seems to be that the fact that a particular process change is useless should not stop the IETF from adopting the change this argument would be nonsense if applied to a proposal for a technical standard - i.e. the IETF should adopt a technical standard that is known to be useless -- it is no less nonsense when applied in this case - changes for the sake of publishing new bits should not be what the IETF spends its time on Scott _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
