ietf  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08 Douglas Otis
  • Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08 Andrew Sullivan
  • Re: [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08 Andrew Sullivan
  • Re: [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08 Douglas Otis
  • Re: [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08 Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08 S Moonesamy
  • Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08 Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard Dan Schlitt
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard John Levine
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard David Conrad
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard S Moonesamy
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard Douglas Otis
• An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt) John C Klensin
  • Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt) Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt) Cyrus Daboo
  • Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt) Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt) John C Klensin
  • Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt) Michelle Cotton
  • Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt) John C Klensin
  • Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt) Patrik Fältström
  • Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt) manning bill
  • Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt) John C Klensin
  • Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt) Masataka Ohta
  • Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt) John C Klensin
  • Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt) Masataka Ohta
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10 Peter Yee
  • Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10 Murray S. Kucherawy
  • RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10 Peter Yee
• Mailman service interruption yesterday Glen
• Mail lost yesterday SM
  • Re: Mail lost yesterday Bob Hinden
  • Re: Mail lost yesterday SM
  • Re: Mail lost yesterday Jari Arkko
  • Re: Mail lost yesterday Mary Barnes
  • Re: Mail lost yesterday SM
  • Re: Mail lost yesterday Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: Mail lost yesterday Yoav Nir
• LC comments on draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt Eric Rosen
  • RE: LC comments on draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt Adrian Farrel
  • RE: LC comments on draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt John C Klensin
  • RE: LC comments on draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt Adrian Farrel
  • RE: LC comments on draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt John C Klensin
• External link to article on trends in anti-surveillance design Dean Willis
  • Re: External link to article on trends in anti-surveillance design Peter Saint-Andre
  • Re: External link to article on trends in anti-surveillance design Ted Lemon
  • Re: External link to article on trends in anti-surveillance design Scott Brim
• Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice SM
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice Barry Leiba
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice SM
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation ofStandards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice t . p .
• "Deprecate" t . p .
  • RE: "Deprecate" Adrian Farrel
  • RE: "Deprecate" Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
  • Re: "Deprecate" Michelle Cotton
  • RE: "Deprecate" Adrian Farrel
  • Re: "Deprecate" t . p .
  • Re: "Deprecate" t . p .
  • RE: "Deprecate" Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
• RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12 Mach Chen
  • RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12 Roni Even
  • RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12 Mach Chen
  • RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12 Roni Even
  • Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12 Loa Andersson
  • RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12 Roni Even
  • Re: Gen-ART LC review ofdraft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12 t . p .
  • RE: Gen-ART LC review ofdraft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12 Roni Even
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12 Roni Even
  • Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12 Loa Andersson
  • RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12 Roni Even
• Re: charging remote participants Bernard Aboba
  • Re: charging remote participants Simon Pietro Romano
• Re: I-D Action: draft-sweet-uri-zoneid-00.txt Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: I-D Action: draft-sweet-uri-zoneid-00.txt Bob Hinden
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-11 Black, David
  • Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-11 Ben Campbell
  • Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-11 Jouni Korhonen
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC Abdussalam Baryun
  • RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC mohamed.boucadair
• Fwd: Fred MacMurray's Casey Farrell
• RE: [Recentattendees] Huawei is the Host for IETF 88 in Vancouver Joachimpillai, Damascene M
• RE: Rude responses l.wood
  • Re: Rude responses Abdussalam Baryun
  • Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?) Tim Chown
  • Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?) JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
  • Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?) Ted Lemon
  • Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?) Scott Brim
  • Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?) Ted Lemon
  • Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?) John Leslie
  • Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?) Ted Lemon
  • Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?) Pete Resnick
  • Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?) Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?) S Moonesamy
  • Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?) Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?) Melinda Shore
  • Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?) S Moonesamy
  • Re: Rude responses JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard Douglas Otis
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard S Moonesamy
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard Douglas Otis
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard Scott Kitterman
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard Douglas Otis
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard Scott Kitterman
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard Douglas Otis
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard Scott Kitterman
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard S Moonesamy
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard Joe Abley
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard S Moonesamy
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard S Moonesamy
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard Patrik Fältström
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard Dave Crocker
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard Scott Kitterman
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard John C Klensin
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard Dave Crocker
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard John C Klensin
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard Mark Andrews
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard Douglas Otis
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard S Moonesamy
  • Macro Expansion (was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard) S Moonesamy
  • Re: Macro Expansion (was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard) Douglas Otis
  • Re: Macro Expansion Pete Resnick
• Re: IETF 88 - Registration Now Open! manning bill
  • Re: IETF 88 - Registration Now Open! John Levine
  • Re: IETF 88 - Registration Now Open! Tim Chown
• Fwd: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF manning bill
  • Re: Fwd: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF John Levine
  • Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF manning bill
  • Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF Hector Santos
  • Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF Hector Santos
  • Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF Scott Kitterman
  • SPF PTR Support [was SPF isn't going to change] Hector Santos
  • Re: SPF PTR Support [was SPF isn't going to change] Scott Kitterman
  • Re: SPF PTR Support [was SPF isn't going to change] Hector Santos
  • Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF bmanning
• Re: [dnsext] full standards, Deprecating SPF Hector Santos
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-directory-framework-07 Black, David
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-netext-update-notifications-07.txt> (Update Notifications for Proxy Mobile IPv6) to Proposed Standard Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
  • Re: [netext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netext-update-notifications-07.txt> (Update Notifications for Proxy Mobile IPv6) to Proposed Standard Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
• RE: [Recentattendees] IETF 88 - Registration Now Open! Mishra, Sanjay
  • GST/PST and IETF 88 Michael Richardson
  • Re: [IAOC] GST/PST and IETF 88 Ray Pelletier
• Huawei to Host IETF 88 in Vancouver! IETF Administrative Director
• New IETF Trust Chair IETF Administrative Director
• Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> Aaron Yi DING
  • Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> Abdussalam Baryun
• SPFBIS LAST CALL: SenderID Framework (PRA, SUBMITTER) Hector Santos
  • Re: SPFBIS LAST CALL: SenderID Framework (PRA, SUBMITTER) S Moonesamy
• Re: WG Review: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited (stir) Dave Crocker
  • Re: WG Review: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited (stir) Christopher Morrow
  • Re: WG Review: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited (stir) Christopher Morrow
  • Re: WG Review: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited (stir) Hannes Tschofenig
  • Re: WG Review: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited (stir) Hadriel Kaplan
  • Re: WG Review: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited (stir) Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-07 Roni Even
  • Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-07 Pete Resnick
• WG overview - MILE video Moriarty, Kathleen
  • Re: WG overview - MILE video Arturo Servin
• RE: [CCAMP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g709v3-11.txt> (Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Extensions for the evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks Control) to Proposed Standard Adrian Farrel
  • RE: [CCAMP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g709v3-11.txt> (Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Extensions for the evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks Control) to Proposed Standard Fatai Zhang
  • RE: [CCAMP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g709v3-11.txt> (Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Extensions for the evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks Control) to Proposed Standard Adrian Farrel
  • RE: [CCAMP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g709v3-11.txt> (Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Extensions for the evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks Control) to Proposed Standard Fatai Zhang
  • RE: [CCAMP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g709v3-11.txt> (Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Extensions for the evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks Control) to Proposed Standard Fatai Zhang
• Re: [dnsext] Deprecating SPF S Moonesamy
  • Re: [dnsext] Deprecating SPF Patrik Fältström
  • Re: [dnsext] Deprecating SPF S Moonesamy
  • Re: [dnsext] Deprecating SPF Patrik Fältström
  • Last call of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19 Patrik Fältström
  • Re: Last call of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19 S Moonesamy
  • Re: [dnsext] Deprecating SPF Mark Andrews
  • Fwd: Re: [dnsext] Deprecating SPF Mark Andrews
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC Lorenzo Colitti
  • Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC james woodyatt
  • Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC Owen DeLong
  • Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC Erik Kline
  • RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC mohamed.boucadair
  • RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC mohamed.boucadair
  • Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC Lorenzo Colitti
  • RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC david.binet
  • Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC Lorenzo Colitti
  • RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC mohamed.boucadair
  • Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC Lorenzo Colitti
  • RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC mohamed.boucadair
  • RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC SM
  • Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC Gert Doering
  • Re: Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC Ray Hunter
  • RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC mohamed.boucadair
  • Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC Dave Cridland
  • Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC Hannes Tschofenig
  • Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC Lorenzo Colitti
  • RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC mohamed.boucadair
  • Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC Lorenzo Colitti
  • RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC mohamed.boucadair
  • Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC Lorenzo Colitti
  • RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC mohamed.boucadair
  • Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC Lorenzo Colitti

• Earlier messages
• Later messages