> > As far as I understand the trust agreement the voting members and the IAD > are members of the trust. If the 'chairs' are non-voting members of the IAOC > then the idea is that they would not be trustees and a modification of the > trust agreement is not needed. That can be clarified. > > > > If the chairs should be trustees (are you arguing that?) then I agree, a > trust agreement modification is needed. > > The Trust Agreement and *only* the Trust Agreement defines who > is a Trustee. At the moment it says that members of the IAOC > under BCP 101 are Trustees, without any qualification such as > "voting". So if we make the I* Chairs non-voting members of > the IAOC by formally updating BCP 101, the I* Chairs would > remain as Trustees. Since that is (in my experience) a large > part of an IAOC member's time commitment, the problem you're > trying to solve would not be solved, IMHO, unless the Trust > amended the Trust Agreement too. That's all I wanted to point out. > > Brian >
Brian's interpretation is correct. If someone is an IAOC member, voting or not, then he/she is a Trustee with full fiduciary duties. To change this, the Trust Agreement would need to be amended.
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
