I think a wiki per RFC with any sort of official IETF status is a bad idea that would create many cesspools of controversy.
Donald On 9/19/11, Melinda Shore <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9/19/11 8:14 AM, Alejandro Acosta wrote: >> +1 >> I also support the idea of every RFC havving the associated wiki. > > I don't. I'm basically in Paul's camp, although I don't think the > greatest risk is that there'd be a negative impact on how the > organization will be perceived by the community (although I agree > that there's considerable risk of that). I wouldn't want to > provide a forum for contentious discussions will never, ever end, > that nothing will ever be resolved, and that people who can't > accept organizational decisions will continue to fight those > battles on the wiki. > > I think there's value in wikis to which people can contribute > implementation and deployment notes, but only if there's a way > to head off endless wars about stuff that's already been resolved > by the IETF. > > Melinda > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > -- Thanks, Donald ============================= Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA [email protected] _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
