On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2011-09-21 05:44, Olaf Kolkman wrote: <snip> >> The Trust would need to commit to allowing these advisors to join their >> meetings too. But that can be done in other ways than the Trust Agreement. >> >> (so yes, I agree with this line of thought) >> >> Obviously this all assumes there is a consensus for changing the I* chairs >> role > > ...exactly. I'm far from convinced about that. I think the real need is to > figure out how to make the IAOC an Oversight committee rather than it getting > involved in executive decisions, and to figure out how to make the IAB an > Architecture board instead of getting involved in administrative matters.
I'm new to this level of innerworking in the IETF, and a bit more confused after this thread. I did ask what was the core problem sort of and got two excellent answers but none of the convinced me that the draft/proposal at hand are the right answer to an obvious problem. However, Brian's suggestion above looks like a better road ahead since it get closer to the core of the problem, the workload and address that. -- Roger Jorgensen | rog...@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | ro...@jorgensen.no _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
