On 2012-01-23 18:24, Mike Jones wrote:
As editor of the Oauth Bearer spec, I believe that these comments have been
well understood and considered by the working group. I do understand that the
working group's consensus position is different than Julian's. See these notes
documenting that this is the case:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08113.html
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08116.html
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08121.html
...
We are going in circles; see
<https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08118.html>.
I can only recommend that people who want to know what's going on read
the complete mail thread.
Also I'd like to point out that I *did* recommend to go to IETF LC
despite these issues because I believe that more review from outside the
WG is needed here.
Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
