What specifically would you like changed in the draft? Can you suggest text?
On Feb 8, 2012, at 5:54 AM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 01:35, Fred Baker <f...@cisco.com> wrote: > The IESG again decided it needed a revised draft, and that draft - in large > part, a rewrite - arrived in October. v6ops had a second WGLC, in which you > again declined to comment, although you may have seen Lorenzo's comments, > which were picked up in a November version of the draft. Ralph and Jari > finally cleared their "discuss" ballots a couple of weeks ago, and we are > having a second IETF last call. > > I'd like to understand your objective here. I know that you don't care for > the draft, and at least at one point took it as a somewhat-personal attack. > Is your objective to prevent the draft's publication entirely, or do you > think that there is value in publishing it given a productive response to > this comment? At what point are you willing to either participate in the > public dialog or choose to not comment at all? > > Ok, let me see if I can rephrase Erik's objection. > > The draft needs to take World IPv6 Launch into account, because it's a key > piece of the puzzle. > > We can't publish an RFC on how to transition content to IPv6 if the RFC > ignores the event when 5 of the top 10 websites in the world (and probably > many more) will permanently enable IPv6 for everyone. > > Cheers, > Lorenzo
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
