On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Masataka Ohta <mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote: > Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> Sure, that's very common, but these devices are consumer electronics and >> will get gradually replaced by IPv6-supporting boxes as time goes on. > > The problem is that IPv6 specification is still broken in > several ways to be not operational that existing boxes must > be replaced after the specification is fixed. > > The more serious problem is that IPv6 people in IETF do > not admit IPv6 broken, which makes it impossible to fix > IPv6.
Make a draft, gather your "supporters" and take that discussion on 6man wg. I'm sure there are people open to consider any arguments on what's wrong/or not. Either way, we're way passed changing any of the important parts of IPv6. That has to be IPv6 v2 WITH backward compability to IPv6 (as we currently know it). -- Roger Jorgensen | rog...@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | ro...@jorgensen.no _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
