On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 02:36:34PM -0800, David Conrad wrote: > Mans, > > On Feb 13, 2012, at 2:17 PM, Måns Nilsson wrote: > > To sum things up, we are at the stage where a /10 is a laughable > > > proposition. > > Other than APNIC, I don't think this is correct. Perhaps folks from the RIRs > can confirm.
Reading from policy texts, it is. What is stuffed away in the RIR dungeons might technically support such an allocation, of course. For some time still. > > It is either 10/8 or squat. No other alternatives exist. I'd expect > > squatting on the "wrong" /8 to be punishable as a Homeland Security > > Department -related crime, if one takes the US-centric view. > > I doubt this, particularly since the use of the addresses we're talking about > is entirely internal. Internal schmernal. Stuff leaks. Either by people watching allocations and going "Hey...." or by routing slip "Hey, this block ain't 1918, let's route it...". > > Folks, we've run out. > > "I'm not dead yet!" (to misquote Monty Python) The rumours are persistent, though. -- Måns. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
