On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 08:32:05 PM Randy Bush wrote:
> i think what richard was trying to hint is that the same tool can be
> used for both good and bad.  and we can't predict that, just because it
> has been used for bad yesteday, it will not be used for good in the rosy
> future.

Yes, but the same argument can be made about unused features.  Just because a 
feature wasn't used so far, we can't predict the future.  It may be useful.

If there's not non-abusive deployment, then it seems reasonable to treat that 
as non-deployment of the feature.

Scott K
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to