>> i think what richard was trying to hint is that the same tool can be >> used for both good and bad. and we can't predict that, just because >> it has been used for bad yesteday, it will not be used for good in >> the rosy future. > > Yes, but the same argument can be made about unused features. Just > because a feature wasn't used so far, we can't predict the future. It > may be useful. > > If there's not non-abusive deployment, then it seems reasonable to > treat that as non-deployment of the feature.
i thought that an interop report is about what has been implemented, not what has been used. randy _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
